【转】雅思考试写作——9分范文（连载完毕）_派派后花园

用户中心 游戏论坛 社区服务
发帖 回复
倒序阅读 最近浏览的帖子最近浏览的版块
« 返回列表
阅读：1127 回复：40

[Writing] 【转】雅思考试写作——9分范文（连载完毕）

 刷新数据 楼层直达
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 20楼  发表于: 2017-05-04 0





雅思9分大作文范文（11）

　题目：Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?

　　范文：

　　Humans are responsible for a variety of environmental problems, but we can also take steps to reduce the damage that we are causing to the planet. This essay will discuss environmental problems and the measures that governments and individuals can take to address these problems.

　　Two of the biggest threats to the environment are air pollution and waste. Gas emissions from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles lead to global warming, which may have a devastating effect on the planet in the future. As the human population increases, we are also producing ever greater quantities of waste, which contaminates the earth and pollutes rivers and oceans.

　　Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.

　　Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.

　　In conclusion, both national governments and individuals must play their part in looking after the environment.




番外不补！ 签到评分/回礼不提醒需要pb联系我
回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 21楼  发表于: 2017-05-04 0





雅思9分大作文范文（12）

题目：Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

　　范文：

　　It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.

　　There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.

　　Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.

　　In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.

　　(258 words)




回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 22楼  发表于: 2017-05-04 0



雅思9分大作文范文（13）

题目：Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

　　范文：

　　When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.

　　The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.

　　On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.

　　For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.

　　(271 words, band 9)


回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 23楼  发表于: 2017-05-04 0



雅思9分大作文范文（13）

　Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion.

　　范文：

　　People have different views about the role and function of museums. In my opinion, museums can and should be both entertaining and educational.

　　On the one hand, it can be argued that the main role of a museum is to entertain. Museums are tourist attractions, and their aim is to exhibit a collection of interesting objects that many people will want to see. The average visitor may become bored if he or she has to read or listen to too much educational content, so museums often put more of an emphasis on enjoyment rather than learning. This type of museum is designed to be visually spectacular, and may have interactive activities or even games as part of its exhibitions.

　　On the other hand, some people argue that museums should focus on education. The aim of any exhibition should be to teach visitors something that they did not previously know. Usually this means that the history behind the museum’s exhibits needs to be explained, and this can be done in various ways. Some museums employ professional guides to talk to their visitors, while other museums offer headsets so that visitors can listen to detailed commentary about the exhibition. In this way, museums can play an important role in teaching people about history, culture, science and many other aspects of life.

　　In conclusion, it seems to me that a good museum should be able to offer an interesting, enjoyable and educational experience so that people can have fun and learn something at the same time.

　　(253 words, band 9)


回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 24楼  发表于: 2017-05-04 0





雅思9分大作文范文（14）

　题目：Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　范文：

　　In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject.

　　Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Student numbers on any course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.

　　Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue to select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a female student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.

　　In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.

　　(265 words, band 9)

回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 25楼  发表于: 2017-05-05 0




标题

for a variety of environmental problems, but we can also take steps to reduce the damage that we are causing to the planet. This essay will discuss environmental problems and the measures that governments and individuals can take to address these problems.

　　Two of the biggest threats to the environment are air pollution and waste. Gas emissions from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles lead to global warming, which may have a devastating effect on the planet in the future. As the human population increases, we are also producing ever greater quantities of waste, which contaminates the earth and pollutes rivers and oceans.

　　Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.

　　Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.

　　In conclusion, both national governments and individuals must play their part in looking after the environment.


回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 26楼  发表于: 2017-05-05 0




标题

minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.

　　There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.

　　Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.

　　In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.

　　(258 words)


回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 27楼  发表于: 2017-05-05 0




标题

　题目：Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

　　范文：

　　When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.

　　The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.

　　On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.

　　For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.

　　(271 words, band 9)


回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 28楼  发表于: 2017-05-05 0


标题


　　In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject.

　　Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Student numbers on any course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.

　　Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue to select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a female student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.

　　In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.

　　(265 words, band 9)



回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 29楼  发表于: 2017-05-05 0




标题

Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion.

　　范文：

　　People have different views about the role and function of museums. In my opinion, museums can and should be both entertaining and educational.

　　On the one hand, it can be argued that the main role of a museum is to entertain. Museums are tourist attractions, and their aim is to exhibit a collection of interesting objects that many people will want to see. The average visitor may become bored if he or she has to read or listen to too much educational content, so museums often put more of an emphasis on enjoyment rather than learning. This type of museum is designed to be visually spectacular, and may have interactive activities or even games as part of its exhibitions.

　　On the other hand, some people argue that museums should focus on education. The aim of any exhibition should be to teach visitors something that they did not previously know. Usually this means that the history behind the museum’s exhibits needs to be explained, and this can be done in various ways. Some museums employ professional guides to talk to their visitors, while other museums offer headsets so that visitors can listen to detailed commentary about the exhibition. In this way, museums can play an important role in teaching people about history, culture, science and many other aspects of life.

　　In conclusion, it seems to me that a good museum should be able to offer an interesting, enjoyable and educational experience so that people can have fun and learn something at the same time.

　　(253 words, band 9)


回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 30楼  发表于: 2017-05-05 0
【转】雅思写作中让考官怒扣分的常见开头


标题

雅思写作是一项比较难以提高的的项目，主要是由于词汇语法和逻辑思维都有所差异，那么有哪些写作方式是比较常见的错误呢？下面前途君就为大家介绍一下。





中式英文


Topic 1-The happiest moment in your life



In our life, there are always some moments which make your heart floweropened angrily……


Topic 2- The population problem


The population problem is a very big problem. For example, in the citycenters of Shanghai, we can always see people mountain people sea there.


Topic3- Is there fairness in today’s business world?


I think in today’s society, there is no fairness in the business world. Forexample, I always chopped when I go out buy things……


Topic 4- The advantage of being a nice person


Being a nice person have many advantage. I believe if a people always dobad things, he will get “baoying”.


观点模糊态度暧昧


Topic-Should college students be allowed to get married?


I think this topic is very hard to say. Because I am still very little,only 17, and not married, so this topic is very difficult for me……


偏离主题


Topic-It is said that nowadays one can not acquire thequalifications and quality essential to success through university education. Towhat extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? (雅思真题)


I think to success, we must have a lot of important qualities. To havethese important qualities, we must learn a lot of things, for example, English,music tools, and etc. We can learn these qualities from our teachers, ourfriends and from books. All in all, we can learn from many places.





语法错误惨不忍睹


Topic-If children behave badly, should their parents acceptresponsibility and also be punished? (雅思真题)


About this problem, my think is if children behave badly, then parents arenot right. Because teach child is parent’s responsibility. So we also punishparents too besides children is also should.


过分简单没有重点


Topic-The importance of environmental protection


This issue is surely very important, let’s talk about it!


用词不当 表达不准


Topic-Should college students be allowed to get married?


I think college students should not be allowed to get married because theyare very young and so we can’t take the responsibility to form a family.



意思重复原地踏步


Topic-Your opinion on DINK families


My opinion on DINK families is that DINK families is not a good thing. Andit is a bad thing. It brings no benefits to our society and it is even sometimesharmful to our society.


中国俗语胡乱翻译


Topic 1-Is it good to have a large family?


I think it is good to have a large family. Because we Chinese believe asentence: “Many sons, many lucks”……


正确说法：Happiness lies in having many children


Topic 2 -Should we pretend to know everything or admit our ignorance?


We all know, our Chinese old fathers and grandfathers said: “Know is know,don’t know is don’t know”……


Topic 3- Do you think one’s character is greatly influenced by his/herfamily?


Chinese old words says very good: Dragon born dragon, phoenix born phoenix,rat’s son can make hole……


Topic 4- The advantage of being a nice person


I believe one sentence:“A good person is all life safe”. We Chinese peoplealways say: “Good has good pay, bad has bad pay”.


观点武断 态度强硬


Topic1-The importance of confidence


In my opinion, confidence is the most important thing for a person. All thesuccessful people in the world are full of confidence. While those people whodon’t have confidence, they all have failed.


Topic 2 - The solution to the traffic problem


I think to solve the traffic problem, very easy! For those who don’t obeythe traffic rules, we should put all of them into prison. If we do that, I’msure there will be no traffic problem any more.


版权声明：部分图片和文字来自网络，版权归原作者所有。如有侵权问题请告知，我们会立即处理。联系方式：[email protected]




[ 此帖被曲径戎在2017-05-05 11:51重新编辑 ]
回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 31楼  发表于: 2017-05-06 0



标题

题目：Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　范文：

　　People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.

　　Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.

　　On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.

　　In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.





回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 32楼  发表于: 2017-05-06 0



标题

Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　范文：

　　It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.

　　On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.

　　On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.

　　In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.

　　(270 words, band 9)





回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 33楼  发表于: 2017-05-06 0



标题

题目：When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　范文：

　　Many people choose their jobs based on the size of the salary offered. Personally, I disagree with the idea that money is the key consideration when deciding on a career, because I believe that other factors are equally important.

　　On the one hand, I agree that money is necessary in order for people to meet their basic needs. For example, we all need money to pay for housing, food, bills, health care, and education. Most people consider it a priority to at least earn a salary that allows them to cover these needs and have a reasonable quality of life. If people chose their jobs based on enjoyment or other non-financial factors, they might find it difficult to support themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance, are known for choosing a career path that they love, but that does not always provide them with enough money to live comfortably and raise a family.

　　Nevertheless, I believe that other considerations are just as important as what we earn in our jobs. Firstly, personal relationships and the atmosphere in a workplace are extremely important when choosing a job. Having a good manager or friendly colleagues, for example, can make a huge difference to workers’ levels of happiness and general quality of life. Secondly, many people’s feelings of job satisfaction come from their professional achievements, the skills they learn, and the position they reach, rather than the money they earn. Finally, some people choose a career because they want to help others and contribute something positive to society.

　　In conclusion, while salaries certainly affect people’s choice of profession, I do not believe that money outweighs all other motivators.





回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 34楼  发表于: 2017-05-06 0



标题

题目：Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent.
 Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　范文：

　　People have different views about whether we are more or less dependent on others nowadays. In my view, modern life forces us to be more independent than people were in the past.

　　There are two main reasons why it could be argued that we are more dependent on each other now. Firstly, life is more complex and difficult, especially because the cost of living has increased so dramatically. For example, young adults tend to rely on their parents for help when buying a house. Property prices are higher than ever, and without help it would be impossible for many people to pay a deposit and a mortgage. Secondly, people seem to be more ambitious nowadays, and they want a better quality of life for their families. This means that both parents usually need to work full-time, and they depend on support from grandparents and babysitters for child care.

　　However, I would agree with those who believe that people are more independent these days. In most countries, families are becoming smaller and more dispersed, which means that people cannot count on relatives as much as they used to. We also have more freedom to travel and live far away from our home towns. For example, many students choose to study abroad instead of going to their local university, and this experience makes them more independent as they learn to live alone. Another factor in this growing independence is technology, which allows us to work alone and from any part of the world.

　　In conclusion, while there are some reasons to believe that people now depend on each other more, my own view is that we are more independent than ever.





回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 35楼  发表于: 2017-05-06 0



标题

　题目：Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

　　范文：

　　It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.

　　The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.

　　If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.

　　In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.

　　(269 words, band 9)





回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 36楼  发表于: 2017-05-07 0



标题

题目：Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?

　　范文：

　　It is true that foreign films are more popular in many countries than domestically produced films. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that governments should promote local film-making by subsidising the industry.

　　There are various reasons why many people find foreign films more enjoyable than the films produced in their own countries. Firstly, the established film industries in certain countries have huge budgets for action, special effects and to shoot scenes in spectacular locations. Hollywood blockbusters like ‘Avatar’ or the James Bond films are examples of such productions and the global appeal that they have. Another reason why these big-budget films are so successful is that they often star the most famous actors and actresses, and they are made by the most accomplished producers and directors. The poor quality, low-budget filmmaking in many countries suffers in comparison.

　　In my view, governments should support local film industries financially. In every country, there may be talented amateur film-makers who just need to be given the opportunity to prove themselves. To compete with big-budget productions from overseas, these people need money to pay for film crews, actors and a host of other costs related to producing high-quality films. If governments did help with these costs, they would see an increase in employment in the film industry, income from film sales, and perhaps even a rise in tourist numbers. New Zealand, for example, has seen an increase in tourism related to the 'Lord of the Rings' films, which were partly funded by government subsidies.

　　In conclusion, I believe that increased financial support could help to raise the quality of locally made films and allow them to compete with the foreign productions that currently dominate the market.

　　(295 words, band 9)



回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 37楼  发表于: 2017-05-07 0



标题

　Task:

　　Public libraries should only provide books and not waste their limited resources on multimedia materials such as videos or DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　公共图书馆应该只提供书籍而不是浪费有限资源在多媒体材料诸如光碟或者DVD上。多大程度上你同意此观点?

　　参考范文：

　　Today, people live in an age of knowledge explosion, more and more people realize the significance of acquiring knowledge. Therefore, public libraries have turned increasingly prevalent. Some people believe that the libraries should not provide multimedia resources such as DVDs and videos. Personally, I am convinced that the multimedia resources are necessary parts of a library.

　　Admittedly, if the public libraries only provide books for readers, the volume and the quality of the management will be improved. For example, the resources occupied by multimedia can be used to store more books. Sometimes when the popular books have too many borrowers, the library can spend the saved money to purchase more books so that they are available to different learners. Also, without offering DVDs or videos, more staff can be assigned to keep and renew the record of the borrowers and thus improving the efficiency of managing the books.

　　However, multimedia resources allow the learners to have access to different information through diverse ways and meet the demands of some visual learners. There are some people who prefer to learn through DVDs or videos because they think that is more direct and convenient, especially for those who have difficulties in reading. Multimedia could open the door to the world of knowledge for them. Without multimedia resources, only a certain group of people has the chance to study history, culture, language and cooking skills though books.

　　From my perspective, the public libraries exist as a kind of traditional place for the learners to wander in the world of knowledge. Therefore, the main resources they provide should be books because according to some surveys, books still have profound influences in our life. On the other hand, living in the modern society with the rapid development of multimedia, the public libraries should also keep abreast with the trend by offering DVDs or videos and other kinds of multimedia resources.(315字)



回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 38楼  发表于: 2017-05-07 0



标题

food choices to improve public health. Others think it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.有些人认为政府应该颁布法律规定选择何种营养或者食物有利于健康，而另一些人不这么认为。请讨论双方的观点并给出你自己的观点。

　　Some people think governments should introduce laws assessing what nutrition and food choices to improve public health. Others think it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　Food is the paramount necessity of people. However, in recent years, we are appalled by the frequent outbreak of such incidents as milk powder adulterated with melamine, lean meat powder and a spate of food contamination cases. In response, a growing number of people call for the government to take decisive actions to tackle food safety hazards by introducing laws assessing food nutrition.

　　People in favor of such practice believe that customers have the right to find out everything about the food to make sure that what they eat is safe. If this information is transparent, then customers can feel free to choose the food they like without worring that this food can be harmful to their health. Besides, by keeping the information about the nutrition of food transparent, it can also discourage food producers from behaving irresponsibly for the food they make since it puts them under the scrutiny of customers. By this means, food producers will be more careful about the materials they add into the food.

　　Nevertheless, some people hold opposite views, believing that releasing such laws fails to solve the food safety issues at its core. They maintain that this law can only result in food producers fabricating their nutrition labels instead of truly reflecting ingredients in their food. What's worse, this cosmetic work can lead to the dereliction of duty by government officials since they may loosen their monitoring on the food with such nutrition labels.

　　In my opinion, it is necessary to issue laws assessing food nutrition since they can hold food producers accountable for what they make by putting them under the scrutiny of customers. However, releasing the law does not mean that law enforcement officials can sit back and relax. Without those people's efforts, laws can only be a piece of paper, having no actual effect. Therefore, it takes both the law and people's action in implementing the law to deliver tangible results in our efforts to ensure food safety.



回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
径戎

ZxID：73023641

172417鲜花 0鸡蛋

等级: 派派版主
配偶: 葉修
[忆1012 1113——/6.29] [婚礼8.29][周年11.04]Ugly people and more troubl.
举报 只看该作者 39楼  发表于: 2017-05-07 0



标题

　Many people use their own cars rather than public transport, so it is up to the government to encourage people to use buses and trains instead. Do you agree or disagree to this statement?很多人使用自己的私家车超过使用公交，因此政府应该鼓励人们使用公交和火车。你在何种程度上同意或者不同意这个观点?

　　The municipality ought to make it not only easier for people to use public transport but also make it more difficult for them to use their own cars. The answer is an up-to-date mass-transit system, which is expected to 'kill two birds with one stone,' so to speak. If everything goes well, the two big problems facing cities today-air pollution and traffic congestion--would be reduced to large extent.

　　There are several benefits to encouraging drivers to adopt other transport options. That is why, in cities with frequent traffic congestion, individuals often choose subway, light rail or bus service. These options can lower the traffic frequency on the roads, and relieve people of the stress associated with driving in heavy traffic. But, first thing first, it is up to the government to improve such infrastructure facilities as contributing to a rapid transport framework. Without an efficient system, it is hardly possible for drivers to consider leaving their cars in the garages. The logic is obvious: people need to move around rapidly, so if public transport proves to be time-saving, they would refrain from using their cars.

　　A modern mass-transit network has less of an environmental impact, apart from the advantage of reducing traffic congestion. The excessive use of private cars is often a health problem due to air pollution. Usually, that part of the city which has the worst congested traffic has the most notorious air pollution. This being the case, a huge sum of money should be spent on mass transit projects on a long-term basis. Before that, the government should take measures to control traffic flow by limiting non-essential driving in cities, if only for better air quality. As to how air pollution may cause climate to change because of the greenhouse effects is another story.

　　All in all, it is imperative for the government to solve the dual-problem of traffic congestion and air pollution through the single strategy of creating a mass transit system that can meet people's aspirations. Therefore, the question is not why but how. The government has the option; so do car owners.



回复 引用 新鲜事
顶端
« 返回列表
发帖 回复